Back to Home Page

Flow ChartArticle

Big Brother or Less Bother

Automotive Electronics, February/March 2005

Think of a world with no speed bumps and no speed cameras, your account is automatically debited as you drive for the cost of insurance, tax, tolls, parking fees and fines for parking and speeding. Integrated in-car GPS and communication systems could mean that all your car's movements can be monitored and your car could be automatically decelerated in low speed zones or even immobilised. Someone will know where your car is at all times.

But on the other hand also think of a world where you don't have to stop at toll booths while you struggle to find the money, no more searching for change to feed the parking meter, where you only have to pay insurance on the miles you do and don't have to subsidise those who drive all day and where, if you break down, the rescue services will automatically be notified and know where to find you. Your car can also inform you when there is traffic congestion ahead and suggest another route.

Like it or hate it the idea of "Big Brother" watching your car is possible; but how far away is the technology and the reality of a national system?

Vehicle Telematics is the term for performing the sort of things described above. It is made possible by the combination of a number of existing technologies that are complex but available at low cost through volume. The technologies provide the functions of location, communication, information about the vehicle and information about the geography of the area in which the vehicle is located.

Examples of these technologies are:

Location - provided by a GPS unit. Currently these are based on the Navstar satellites; later this decade an alternative (the Galileo system) will become available

Communication - cellular phone systems provide the communication and in Europe this means the GSM system, usually in GPRS mode

Vehicle information - Engine management units have been used in most cars for some years. The function of these units has been extended to provide monitoring of many functions of the vehicle

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) - Digital map information can be processed to relate the vehicles location to specific roads, car parks, etc.

Most of the technology for vehicle telematics already exists and different subsets of it are in use today. The key is in combining the power of these technologies.

What is happening now?

In the mid to late nineties telematics was thought to be a huge growth area but the business case for the services it could provide was not well thought out and telematics as a big business area failed to take off.

Some cars are already fitted with in-car units which are used for remote diagnostics and enable the option of in-car navigation products. In Europe at the moment factory fit is mainly limited to the up-market vehicle manufacturers like BMW. It is expected that this will, like other car refinements, filter downmarket. One report states that Ford will be equipping all cars by this year some time and in the UK the facility was offered as an option on most cars in the range from November 2004. Increasingly the basic hardware and software will be factory fitted in the vehicles. Where this is not done then there may be a problem interfacing with the vehicles engine management and information systems particularly as there are no standards in this area. Forecasts indicate that all cars will be factory fitted by 2012. However, this will still leave a large number of cars on the road with no units or with incompatible ones.

The real applications to date have been in vehicle fleet management where the business case is much clearer. The main areas of application have been car rental fleets and in freight logistics management. The potential benefits in these areas were recognised some time ago and implemented in order to gain a commercial advantage. Several large freight fleet operators have systems in operation which monitor vehicle movement and performance and enable the operators to re-route vehicles to maximise utilisation.

Norwich Union is already conducting a trial to monitor vehicle use and is currently implementing a service of "pay as you use" insurance premiums.

An associated area which is relatively large and active is Electronic Fee Collection (EFC) which is the collection of fees from vehicles for a variety of reasons such as:
· Motorway tolls
· Lorry road use charging
· Restricted Access Charging (Congestion charging)
· Parking

There are a number of systems in operation across the world with more being planned. Most of them use microwave radio, DSRC (Digital Short Range Communication) at 5.8GHz and consist of an in-vehicle unit that responds to devices mounted on gantries at tolling stations. These do not therefore strictly use location except in the sense that the vehicle unit says "I am X and I am here" and the gantry contains the location information. Systems for this purpose could use GPS as the means to determine vehicle location and there is pressure from the EU to do so using the Galileo system. However, the timescale for this is such that there will be a large installed base of DSRC systems by the time the Galileo GPS system is available.

Nevertheless this is an active area and one in which the business case is relatively clear. There are several working motorway toll collection and road usage schemes in operation and many studies and trials in this area.

What of the future?

The technologies are already available in terms of in-car unit (demonstrated by commercial fleet management systems and in-car navigation systems) but to get a universal unit appropriate to a national or pan-European system will require agreement on common technology and standards (preferably between countries) - already divergent - and will require a very low cost unit.

Exciting evolving technologies will play a part in these systems. Voice recognition technology is already available from manufacturers like Honda and BMW to control in-car equipment and to access navigation information. Head-up displays, originally designed for use in fighter aircraft, are now available as an option from BMW and display conventional instrument functions and navigation information. Like other technologies these will develop and filter downmarket where they prove to increase driver comfort and vehicle safety

The different components of current systems are interconnected in different ways; mainly by the use of dedicated wiring. Although the data rates required are relatively low it is likely that manufacturers will integrate these functions in to vehicle bus systems such as MOST

Most of the systems in use today either provide services to individual car drivers or operate on relatively small fleets of vehicles. Implementing a national scheme will be an altogether different challenge.

The sheer size of the problem is daunting. There are over 31 million licensed vehicles in Britain and traffic now totals over 500 billion vehicle kilometres per year. If the system is to operate in real time then, assuming that a vehicle's position must be logged at least every half kilometre, a thousand billion messages will be sent across the communications network. These then have to be logged and interpreted to keep track of all vehicles and produce billing information etc. This will require an IT system of almost unimaginable size and complexity and the implementation of very large IT systems is notoriously difficult.

The UK government has already indicated that a national road charging system will become a necessity in order to make better use of the UK road capacity particularly in terms of alleviating increasing traffic congestion. The government Feasibility Study of Road Pricing, published in 2004, indicates that road charging will almost certainly be implemented at some time in the future. Although the study indicates that it is unlikely to be practical until 2014, the Lorry Road Use charging scheme, to be introduced in 2007/8, will anticipate many of the features of a national charging scheme. However it is not clear whether it will be compatible with a later system for all vehicles.

It would be highly expensive to introduce a scheme and running costs have been estimated as £3billion a year. However the potential savings are also large - there is potential for £12 billion worth of timesavings. A very low cost car unit will be required to minimise the upfront cost of equipping 30 million vehicles.

Apart from the technical challenges there will be major social and political issues to overcome; politically there must be some benefits to users in order to get public acceptance. There will be advantages for the public in terms of better traffic flow but these are difficult to quantify and it will be necessary to overcome perceptions of a "Big Brother" system.

There are practical problems of fitting very large number of vehicles with units although increasingly these will be factory fitted to new vehicles. Also,, what do you do with a mixed population of some cars with and some without?

Controlling the speed of vehicles remotely will certainly be technically possible but this is not seen as any part of a national system. This has already been considered for stopping or slowing stolen vehicles but has very difficult safety implications. By way of example, stopping a stolen vehicle in the outside lane of a motorway is not a good move and what if the system slows a speeding motorist and someone runs in to him?

Conclusion

These vehicle telematics applications won't be easy to implement, technically or politically - and it won't happen for a long while. However, the technical building blocks are there, it will come and it will assist in optimising use of the UK road network.

Written by Michael Woodley, Senior Consultant